Warland EE and Warland Airland is a better game with realism in mind. But then, it's not a really a strong leap in gaming. The only good thing is the true sight mechanic. Won't trust the Metacritic? Just check the Steam reviews, you can see some reviewers have invested 300+ hours to the game and still, they give negative reviews. ![]() After the disaster of DoW3, i don't think they have too much space for ambitious decisions.In short : Not worth playing. The problem with going modern is that it's a really risky call. ![]() If EA didn't get access to Star Wars rights and them later having Titan Falls IPs, i would had said that the future was a more likely choice. ![]() The BF1 announcement was a surprise, cause it could had gone in any direction after the latest DLC of BF4 (prelude to 2142 and also one DLC based on Titan mode, even if it was underwhelming) but mostly futuristic at first. BF V was not surprising to be WW2 after WW1. BF tend to re-use quite a lot of assets and generally doesn't move too much from version to version unless there's a huge generational/tech changes. That was more like a "confirmation" that a proper surprising leak. A former DICE dev had a portfolio with WW2 weapons LEAKED in the internet and this thing goes to public 1 year before the BFV reveal. Jump back to quoted post, 21:45 PM nigo Just to remember something like that happened in Battlefield franchise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |